☰Spotify is not primarily an audio company expanding into new verticals — it is a global attention platform whose core asset is 756 million monthly active users and the behavioural data those users generate.
The verticals (podcasts, audiobooks, video, live events, creator tools) are not diversification — they are mechanisms for increasing time-on-platform, deepening the data flywheel, and creating higher-margin revenue streams that partially bypass the label royalty structure that structurally caps music gross margins at ~33%.
With ~31% global audio streaming market share, an accelerating creator economy monetisation strategy via the Spotify Partner Program, and a proven margin transformation from loss-making to €2.9B in free cash flow in just two years, Spotify has demonstrated the operating discipline to match its platform ambition.
The long-term destination — a global media giant anchored in audio but expanding through video, creator tools, and advertising — is directionally achievable. The key question is whether Spotify can reduce its structural dependence on the Big Three music labels before the next licensing cycle gives them negotiating leverage to extract margin gains.
With 756 million MAUs across 184 markets and ~31% global audio streaming share, Spotify's scale lead over Apple Music, Amazon Music, and YouTube Music is substantial and growing. The Q4 2025 record of 38 million net MAU additions in a single quarter — the largest in company history — confirms the flywheel is accelerating. No audio competitor approaches this scale.
Spotify's recommendation engine (Discover Weekly, Daily Mixes, AI DJ) is trained on more listening data than any competitor has ever accumulated. More users generate better recommendations, which drive longer sessions, which generate more data. The ChatGPT partnership (October 2025) extends the personalization flywheel into the agentic AI landscape. Each vertical expansion adds new behavioural signals that deepen the data advantage.
The Spotify Partner Program (launched January 2025) is the key new moat-building initiative. Monthly video podcast consumption has nearly doubled since launch. Spotify paid out $100M+ to podcast publishers in Q1 2025 alone. As creator monetisation improves, more top creators migrate to Spotify as their primary platform, attracting more listeners, attracting more advertisers — a three-sided flywheel.
Two constraints limit the score. Music gross margins are structurally capped at ~33% because ~70% of premium music revenue must be paid to the Big Three labels. And YouTube — not Apple Music — is the genuine long-term competitor, owning the video podcast format and now ranked #1 for monthly US podcast listeners per Edison Research 2025.
Trait 1 — Vision (8/10): Ek's vision — Spotify as the world's primary audio attention platform and creator economy hub — is specific, long-term, and consistently operationalised. The 2025 framing of the year as 'Accelerated Execution' and 2026 as the 'Year of Raising Ambition' reflects genuine strategic clarity.
Trait 2 — Skin in game (6/10): Ek and Lorentzon together control 70.7% of the voting power — exceptional governance. However, Ek has established a biweekly selling pattern in 2025, cashing out ~$268M since January 2025 alone and $800M+ since July 2023. Lorentzon similarly sold $556M in 2024. The voting control structure means this does not threaten strategic direction, but the selling pace is inconsistent with radical long-termism.
Traits 3 & 5 — Product obsession and capital efficiency (8/10 each): 30 product updates shipped in Q4 2025 alone. The margin transformation from loss-making to €2.9B FCF in two years is exceptional capital discipline. FCF margin is expected to reach €3.5B in 2026. Ek has foregone salary since 2017 in favour of performance-based comp tied to growth metrics.
Trait 4 — Execution velocity (7/10): Consistently delivers on product roadmap. The 2022–23 podcast rationalisation (exiting exclusive content deals) and the 2024–25 margin transformation were both executed cleanly. Mild deduction for the Q3 2025 operating income guidance miss and the co-CEO transition uncertainty.
Trait 6 — Talent and org scaling (6/10): The new co-CEO structure (Norström and Söderström) is unproven. Both are Spotify veterans but dual-leadership models carry execution risk. Ek remaining as Chairman provides continuity.
P/S of ~5.1× on FY2025 USD revenue puts Spotify exactly at the framework's ~5× ceiling. Unlike Lemonade where forward P/S compresses dramatically on accelerating revenue, Spotify's 15% revenue growth rate means forward P/S on 2026E revenue (~$22–23B) is approximately 4.3–4.5× — within threshold but not compelling. At current growth rates this is not a deeply discounted entry.
The margin transformation is the genuine financial highlight. Spotify achieved its first full year of operating income profitability in 2024, then expanded operating income to ~€2.4B in FY2025 at a ~14% margin. FCF hit €2.9B. Analysts project FCF of €3.5B in 2026. This transition from loss-making to significant cash generation in two years is exceptional execution.
Music royalty payments as a share of revenue are projected to fall from 71% to 64% by 2030 as higher-margin podcast, advertising, and audiobook revenues grow. Ad-supported gross margin expanded to 19.5% in Q4 2025, up 441bps YoY. The long-term gross margin ceiling is likely 35–40%, not 33%, as mix shifts toward higher-margin verticals.
The stock trades at P/E ~40× on FY2025 earnings. For 15% revenue growth with stable margins, this requires a re-rating toward 50–60× as the market prices in advertising and creator economy optionality.
Label leverage: The Big Three (Universal, Sony, Warner) control ~70% of recorded music and pay €10B+ annually in royalties. Any licensing renewal friction could push gross margins back toward 28–29%. Universal's demands for higher royalty splits and exclusive content is a standing threat. This is the single most structurally important risk in the entire thesis.
YouTube competition: YouTube is now the #1 podcast platform for monthly US listeners per Edison Research 2025. Its 2B+ user base, creator monetisation infrastructure, and Google advertising stack make it a formidable competitor for Spotify's creator economy ambitions. If YouTube wins the video podcast format war, Spotify's creator flywheel thesis loses its most important growth engine.
Ad revenue cyclicality: The stock decline in early 2026 was largely due to ad-supported revenue slowdown. Spotify's advertising business is still rebuilding after transitioning away from its rented ad stack. Any macro-driven ad spend pullback in 2026 directly impacts the margin expansion story.
Co-CEO transition risk: The new structure with Norström and Söderström is unproven. The Q3 2025 operating income guidance miss was minor but illustrative of transition period execution gaps. Monitor H1 2026 closely.
Price sensitivity: A 9–22% price hike in Benelux triggered a 260% spike in 'cancel Spotify' searches. A 1% churn increase costs ~€120M in annual EBIT. Further price increases require careful calibration against a cost-of-living pressured consumer.
SPOT is down ~39% from its all-time high of $785 (June 2025) to ~$481 today, despite FY2025 being the best year in company history by operating income, FCF, MAU additions, and gross margin. Q4 2025 record 38M MAU net adds, 756M total MAUs, 33.1% gross margin, €2.9B FCF. J.P. Morgan reiterated Buy on March 10, 2026.
The selloff is macro-driven (broad tech multiple compression) and narrative-driven (co-CEO transition, Ek share sales misread as confidence loss) — not fundamental deterioration. The voting control structure means Ek's share sales are governance-irrelevant but retail investors treated them as a sell signal.
The correct action is a starter position now (~25% of intended size) and aggressive DCA on any pullback toward P/S ~4× (implied ~$380–400). At that level, the framework's full BUY criteria would be met: forward P/S ~3.5×, bull case upside 4–5×, bear case downside 25–30%.
Spotify is the dominant global audio platform with 756 million MAUs, genuine network effects, and a proven margin transformation — €2.9B in FY2025 FCF from a company that was loss-making two years ago. The creator economy expansion into video podcasts, audiobooks, and creator monetisation gives the thesis a second long-term growth leg. The dual-founder voting control structure (Ek + Lorentzon controlling 70.7% of votes) is an exceptional governance positive rarely found in public tech companies at this scale.
The reason this is WATCHLIST rather than BUY comes down to Pillar 3. At P/S ~5.1× on FY2025 revenue, the valuation is at the framework's upper threshold — not distressed, not compelling. The base case of 1.6–2.1× over 5 years is too modest for a framework targeting 10–100× over a decade. The structural royalty ceiling permanently limits the margin ceiling relative to pure software peers, and the bear case at 40–58% downside carries meaningful probability if label negotiations deteriorate.
The correct action: initiate a 25% starter position at current prices (~$480) and build aggressively on any pullback toward $380–400 (P/S ~4×). At that level, the forward P/S drops to ~3.5×, the bull case expands to 4–5× upside, and the bear case downside narrows to 25–30%. Watch three catalysts: H2 2026 advertising turnaround data, the first 12 months of co-CEO execution, and any label licensing renewal news from Universal or Sony.
Not financial advice
The analyses published on Triportfolio are for informational and educational purposes only. Nothing on this site constitutes financial advice, investment advice, trading advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Triportfolio is not a licensed financial advisor, broker, or investment professional.
All investment analysis reflects the personal views and independent research of the author at the time of publication. Markets change rapidly and analyses may become outdated. Past performance of any security discussed is not indicative of future results.
Investing in equities — particularly early and mid-stage growth companies — involves significant risk, including the possible loss of the entire amount invested. The companies discussed on this site are typically high-volatility, high-risk investments that may not be suitable for all investors.
Before making any investment decision, you should conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial professional who understands your personal financial situation, risk tolerance, and investment objectives.